Difference between revisions of "Talk:Cryptomancy Page"
From Dragon
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
"rub how whip"? Seriously? --[[User:HeidiB|HeidiB]] 12:42, 26 September 2010 (UTC) | "rub how whip"? Seriously? --[[User:HeidiB|HeidiB]] 12:42, 26 September 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : It strikes me that Autumn Rose's method of solving the page is to find the names, which is fitting because she is a collector of names. Lord Takanata's method, as suits a master of the i-ching, is to find the small inconsequential seeming words which are necessarily limited in number and build to a greater meaning from there. My method is to guess from a set of larger words that have do with relationships, astrology, elements or spirits. Xian's method seems to be... Confounding. [[User:Elizabeth|Elizabeth]] 16:13, 27 September 2010 (UTC) | ||
This is much clearer if you have a font which doesn't render a lot of underlines as a solid line. I'm calling for monaco here, because that's reasonably common, and is clearer than anything else I have except for DPCustomMono2, which is the special-designed font for telling things apart. --[[User:Boojum|Boojum]] 21:53, 19 September 2010 (UTC) | This is much clearer if you have a font which doesn't render a lot of underlines as a solid line. I'm calling for monaco here, because that's reasonably common, and is clearer than anything else I have except for DPCustomMono2, which is the special-designed font for telling things apart. --[[User:Boojum|Boojum]] 21:53, 19 September 2010 (UTC) | ||
Added another font at Cael's request; feel free to stuff your own fonts in as options. | Added another font at Cael's request; feel free to stuff your own fonts in as options. | ||
Revision as of 12:13, 27 September 2010
"rub how whip"? Seriously? --HeidiB 12:42, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- It strikes me that Autumn Rose's method of solving the page is to find the names, which is fitting because she is a collector of names. Lord Takanata's method, as suits a master of the i-ching, is to find the small inconsequential seeming words which are necessarily limited in number and build to a greater meaning from there. My method is to guess from a set of larger words that have do with relationships, astrology, elements or spirits. Xian's method seems to be... Confounding. Elizabeth 16:13, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
This is much clearer if you have a font which doesn't render a lot of underlines as a solid line. I'm calling for monaco here, because that's reasonably common, and is clearer than anything else I have except for DPCustomMono2, which is the special-designed font for telling things apart. --Boojum 21:53, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
Added another font at Cael's request; feel free to stuff your own fonts in as options.
